Tuesday, 16 March 2021

CASE STUDY WHAT CAREER DO I WANT?



CLIENT

The client had three career paths available to them. The first was secure, interesting and rewarding, but only part-time. The second was based on a lifetime and family interest with potential for income. The third was based on a technical skill which was financially rewarding but less compelling as a long-term option. The coaching conversation centred around these options and the lifestyle implications, issues and opportunities arising from each and/or a blend of these.

SESSIONS

At first the coaching conversation followed the clients past, interests and background and the context in which the options were being considered.

The coach tentatively offered that the coach for the exercise may be to make a decision but it became clear that there was no pressing timescale for a decision and indeed the options were not exclusionary (only one option). The coaching conversation therefore was an exploration of options and the clients feeling for each (confidence, capacity, drive, desire) rather than toward any specific conclusion or selection.

The second coaching conversation followed some recent changes at work which favoured one option over another, but again with no requirement to make any specific commitment. The coaching conversation therefore focussed on the future rather than the "hear and now" with a view to exploring an ideal future for which steps could be made without compromise to the existing situation.

REFLECTIONS

The coaching conversation about the clients past, interests and background drew the coach to want to take a psychoanalytical approach with considerable curiosity to the experience and motivations of the client. However this urge was resisted in favour of a client-centred approach.

In the psychoanalytic approach, the focus is on the unconscious mind rather than the conscious mind. It is built on the foundational idea that your behavior is determined by experiences from your past that are lodged in your unconscious mind.

The client-centered approach focuses on providing unconditional positive regard, empathy, and genuine support in order to help the client reach a more congruent view of herself. This means letting the client set the agenda, scope, direction and outcomes rather than the coach be the expert/teacher/doctor with the client being the student/candidate/patient.

It was the coaches view that the psychoanalytical approach would be interesting for the coach, but the client-centered approach more useful for the client.

For the coach the coaching conversation represents an open dialogue which is supportive for the client. An explanation may help: If two friends trust each other they may well seek each others counsel and explore thoughts and feelings, and well as exchange ideas and experiences. This does not "end" as soon as one person feels better about something that vexes or intrigues them. The relationship is still there and a resource which may be called upon again and again but without committent, obligation or a schedule.

IMPORTANT NOTES

The Coach engages in training and continuing education pursuing and/or maintaining ICF (International Coach Federation) credentials. All coaching conversations are confidential and the abbreviated case above has been amended so as to protect the anonymity for the client whilst providing evidence of coaching practice, reflection and learning, for the purposes of ICF education, supervision, or oversight.

All coaching engagements follow ICF Policies and Principles Resources, Terms and Conditions https://www.adaptconsultingcompany.com/coachingtoolkit/client.php